The fact that PyPy needs to use scientific notation to print the results of a pystone benchmark... :-)
Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 0.016978
This machine benchmarks at 2.94499e+06 pystones/second
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
These are the robots I've been working on for the last 12 months. They each weigh about 11 tonnes and have a 17 meter reach. The control... -
This hard-to-see screenshot is a Generic Node Graph Editing framework I'm building. I'm hoping it can be used for any kind of node... -
Unfortunately I've not secured a venue for the GGJ. With 9 days left, things are not looking hopeful. It could be that GGJ Perth will no...
-
So, you've created a car prefab using WheelCollider components, and now you can apply a motorTorque to make the whole thing move along. ... -
MiddleMan: A Pub/Sub and Request/Response server in Go. This is my first Go project. It is a rewrite of an existing Python server, based o...
-
Often, when building a game, you need to test if objects are colliding. The objects could be spaceships, rocks, mouse pointers, laser beams....
-
I've just read a newspaper article (courtesy of Kranzky ) from WA Business News documenting the malfeasance, gross negligence and misc...
-
Space is awesome. Especially when it is generated using Perlin noise, and some cool shaders. You can try it out over here. -
I made something which lets you render very large worlds with a small farClipPlane. https://github.com/simonwittber/scaled-origin The d...
-
After my last post, I decided to benchmark the scaling properties of Stackless, Kamaelia, Fibra using the same hackysack algorithm. Left axi...
3 comments:
What computer is that!? On my it tops out at around 620k pystones/sec (3.0 ghz core2)
My 2.4Ghz i7 Macbook Pro.
.... is an i7 really that much more powerful than my 3-4 year old core2duo? Wow.... (I find it hard to believe, but I guess the numbers aren't lying)
Post a Comment