After my last post, I decided to benchmark the scaling properties of Stackless, Kamaelia, Fibra using the same hackysack algorithm.
Left axis is milliseconds.
Bottom axis is number of tasks * 100.
Green line is Kamaelia.
Blue line is Fibra.
Red Line is Stackless.
These are the results, using Python 2.6.1 to run Fibra and Kamaelia, and Stackless 2.6.1 to run the Stackless test:
These are the results when using Stackless 2.6.1 to run all the tests:
It's quite interesting to see that Fibra copes with 600000 tasks better than 500000 tasks in both sets of results. Strange.
Thank to Adrian Boeing I was inspired this morning to hack together a ripple shader for Unity3D. Thanks for the math Adrian. You can see t...
I've been working on something new. I get a lot of projects where I have to add multiuser functionality. Finally I've made the jump ...
Working with multiple threads is often a necessary evil. This is how I do it safely inside a Unity3D component. There are only certain time...
When you start working with threads in your Unity3D project, you will discover that many things need to be done in the main loop. For exampl...
Possibly slightly more correct lighting. The rim light is now only applied in the direction of the sun, rather than being purely based on v...
So, you've created a car prefab using WheelCollider components, and now you can apply a motorTorque to make the whole thing move along. ...
Still lots of improvements to be made... but it is definitely getting better.
This is something I use to capture errors and log-information from games that are out in the wild, and report them back home to my server. ...
I applied the greeble system to another spacecraft shell, trying to make some kind of freighter. This highlighted a few issues. Greeble...
Step 1. Tell you team that everything must fit within 1920x1080 or 1024x768 or whatever resolution you like! Step 2. Surround all OnGUI met...